equivalence checking

As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different perspectives. One of them is based on the ZX-calculus, a graphical rewriting system for quantum computing. However, the power and capability of this equivalence checking method has barely been explored. The aim of this work is to evaluate the ZX-calculus as a tool for equivalence checking of quantum circuits. To this end, it is demonstrated how the ZX-calculus based approach for equivalence checking can be expanded in order to verify the results of compilation flows and optimizations on quantum circuits. It is also shown that the ZX-calculus based method is not complete—especially for quantum circuits with ancillary …

As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different perspectives. However, there is no established baseline on which to judge current and future progress in equivalence checking of quantum circuits. In order to close this gap, we conduct a detailed case study of two of the most promising equivalence checking methodologies—one based on quantum decision diagrams and one based on the ZX-calculus—and compare their strengths and weaknesses.

Quantum computers are reaching a level where interactions between classical and quantum computations can happen in real-time. This marks the advent of a new, broader class of quantum circuits: dynamic quantum circuits. They offer a broader range of available computing primitives that lead to new challenges for design tasks such as simulation, compilation, and verification. Due to the non-unitary nature of dynamic circuit primitives, most existing techniques and tools for these tasks are no longer applicable in an out-of-the-box fashion. In this work, we discuss the resulting consequences for quantum circuit verification, specifically equivalence checking, and propose two different schemes that eventually allow to treat the involved circuits as if they did not contain non-unitaries at all. As a result, we demonstrate methodically, as well as, experimentally that existing techniques for verifying the equivalence of quantum circuits can be kept applicable for this broader class of circuits.

Executing quantum circuits on currently available quantum computers requires compiling them to a representation that conforms to all restrictions imposed by the targeted architecture. Due to the limited connectivity of the devices’ physical qubits, an important step in the compilation process is to map the circuit in such a way that all its gates are executable on the hardware. Existing solutions delivering optimal solutions to this task are severely challenged by the exponential complexity of the problem. In this paper, we show that the search space of the mapping problem can be limited drastically while still preserving optimality. The proposed strategies are generic, architecture-independent, and can be adapted to various mapping methodologies. The findings are backed by both, theoretical considerations and experimental evaluations. Results confirm that, by limiting the search space, optimal solutions can be determined for instances that timeouted before or speed-ups of up to three orders of magnitude can …

Quantum computing is gaining serious momentum in these days. With increasing capabilities of corresponding devices also comes the need for efficient and automated tools to design them. Verification, i.e., ensuring that the originally intended functionality of a quantum algorithm/circuit is preserved throughout all layers of abstraction during the design process, is a vital part of the quantum software stack. In this work, we present QCEC, a tool for quantum circuit equivalence checking which is part of the JKQ toolset for quantum computing. By exploiting characteristics unique to quantum computing, the tool allows users to efficiently verify the equivalence of two quantum circuits using a variety of methods and strategies.

In the not-so-distant future, quantum computing will change the way we tackle certain problems. It promises to dramatically speed-up many chemical, financial, cryptographical, and machine-learning applications. However, in order to capitalize on those promises, complex design flows composed of steps such as compilation, decomposition, mapping, or transpilation need to be employed before being able to execute a conceptual quantum algorithm on an actual device. This results in many descriptions at various levels of abstraction which may significantly differ from each other. The complexity of the underlying design problems makes it ever more important to not only provide efficient solutions for the single steps, but also to verify that the originally intended functionality is preserved throughout all levels of abstraction. This motivates methods for equivalence checking of quantum circuits. However, most existing methods for this are inspired by equivalence checking in the classical realm and have merely been …

Verification of quantum circuits is essential for guaranteeing correctness of quantum algorithms and/or quantum descriptions across various levels of abstraction. In this work, we show that there are promising ways to check the correctness of quantum circuits using simulative verification and random stimuli. To this end, we investigate how to properly generate stimuli for efficiently checking the correctness of a quantum circuit. More precisely, we introduce, illustrate, and analyze three schemes for quantum stimuli generation—offering a trade-off between the error detection rate (as well as the required number of stimuli) and efficiency. In contrast to the verification in the classical realm, we show (both, theoretically and empirically) that even if only a few randomly-chosen stimuli (generated from the proposed schemes) are considered, high error detection rates can be achieved for quantum circuits. The results of these conceptual and theoretical considerations have also been empirically confirmed—with a …

Realizing a conceptual quantum algorithm on an actual physical device necessitates the algorithm’s quantum circuit description to undergo certain transformations in order to adhere to all constraints imposed by the hardware. In this regard, the individual high-level circuit components are first synthesized to the supported low-level gate-set of the quantum computer, before being mapped to the target’s architecture—utilizing several optimizations in order to improve the compilation result. Specialized tools for this complex task exist, e.g., IBM’s Qiskit, Google’s Cirq, Microsoft’s QDK, or Rigetti’s Forest. However, to date, the circuits resulting from these tools are hardly verified, which is mainly due to the immense complexity of checking if two quantum circuits indeed realize the same functionality. In this paper, we propose an efficient scheme for quantum circuit equivalence checking—specialized for verifying results of the IBM Qiskit quantum circuit …

High-level descriptions of quantum algorithms do not take the restrictions of physical hardware into account. Therefore actually executing an algorithm in the form of a quantum circuit on a quantum computer requires compiling it for the desired target architecture first. The compilation of quantum circuits depends on efficient methods to be feasible for all but the trivial instances. To this end, different compiling methods have been introduced in the past, but room for improvement still exists. Moreover, just an efficient compilation process itself is not sufficient—the resulting circuits must be correct as well. In this summary paper, we review how existing compilation approaches can be optimized by utilizing heuristic search algorithms or exact reasoning engines. Furthermore, we review how the correctness of the obtained results can be verified afterwards by clever data structures such as decision diagrams. This illustrates core steps of a compilation flow which can generate minimal or close-to-minimal …

The rapid rate of progress in the physical realization of quantum computers sparked the development of elaborate design flows for quantum computations on such devices. Each stage of these flows comes with its own representation of the intended functionality. Ensuring that each design step preserves this intended functionality is of utmost importance. However, existing solutions for equivalence checking of quantum computations heavily struggle with the complexity of the underlying problem and, thus, no conclusions on the equivalence may be reached with reasonable efforts in many cases. In this work, we uncover the power of simulation for equivalence checking in quantum computing. We show that, in contrast to classical computing, it is in general not necessary to compare the complete representation of the respective computations. Even small errors frequently affect the entire representation and, thus, can be detected within a couple of simulations. The resulting equivalence checking flow substantially improves …