1

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) techniques are well-established in classical computing where they are used to solve a broad variety of problems, e.g., in the design of classical circuits and systems. Analogous to the classical realm, quantum algorithms are usually modelled as circuits and similar design tasks need to be tackled. Thus, it is natural to pose the question whether these design tasks in the quantum realm can also be approached using SAT techniques. To the best of our knowledge, no SAT formulation for arbitrary quantum circuits exists and it is unknown whether such an approach is feasible at all. In this work, we define a propositional SAT encoding that, in principle, can be applied to arbitrary quantum circuits. However, we show that, due to the inherent complexity of representing quantum states, constructing such an encoding is not feasible in general. Therefore, we establish general criteria for determining the feasibility of the proposed encoding and identify classes of quantum circuits fulfilling …

As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different perspectives. However, there is no established baseline on which to judge current and future progress in equivalence checking of quantum circuits. In order to close this gap, we conduct a detailed case study of two of the most promising equivalence checking methodologies—one based on quantum decision diagrams and one based on the ZX-calculus—and compare their strengths and weaknesses.

Quantum computers are reaching a level where interactions between classical and quantum computations can happen in real-time. This marks the advent of a new, broader class of quantum circuits: dynamic quantum circuits. They offer a broader range of available computing primitives that lead to new challenges for design tasks such as simulation, compilation, and verification. Due to the non-unitary nature of dynamic circuit primitives, most existing techniques and tools for these tasks are no longer applicable in an out-of-the-box fashion. In this work, we discuss the resulting consequences for quantum circuit verification, specifically equivalence checking, and propose two different schemes that eventually allow to treat the involved circuits as if they did not contain non-unitaries at all. As a result, we demonstrate methodically, as well as, experimentally that existing techniques for verifying the equivalence of quantum circuits can be kept applicable for this broader class of circuits.

Quantum computers promise to efficiently solve important problems classical computers never will. However, in order to capitalize on these prospects, a fully automated quantum software stack needs to be developed. This involves a multitude of complex tasks from the classical simulation of quantum circuits, over their compilation to specific devices, to the verification of the circuits to be executed as well as the obtained results. All of these tasks are highly non-trivial and necessitate efficient data structures to tackle the inherent complexity. Starting from rather straight-forward arrays over decision diagrams (inspired by the design automation community) to tensor networks and the ZX-calculus, various complementary approaches have been proposed. This work provides a look “under the hood” of today’s tools and showcases how these means are utilized in them, e.g., for simulation, compilation, and verification of quantum circuits.

Decision diagrams have proven to be a useful data structure in both, conventional and quantum computing, to compactly represent exponentially large data in many cases. Several approaches exist to further reduce the size of decision diagrams, i.e., their number of nodes. Reordering is one such approach to shrink decision diagrams by changing the order of variables in the representation. In the conventional world, this approach is established and its availability taken for granted. For quantum computing however, first approaches exist, but could not fully exploit a similar potential yet. In this paper, we investigate the differences between reordering decision diagrams in the conventional and the quantum world and, afterwards, unveil challenges that explain why reordering is much harder in the latter. A case study shows that, also for quantum computing, reordering may lead to improvements of several orders of magnitude in the size of the decision diagrams, but also requires substantially more runtime.

The classical simulation of quantum circuits is essential in the development and testing of quantum algorithms. Methods based on tensor networks or decision diagrams have proven to alleviate the inevitable exponential growth of the underlying complexity in many cases. But the complexity of these methods is very sensitive to so-called contraction plans or simulation paths, respectively, which define the order in which respective operations are applied. While, for tensor networks, a plethora of strategies has been developed, simulation based on decision diagrams is mostly conducted in a straight-forward fashion thus far. In this work, we envision a flow that allows to translate strategies from the domain of tensor networks to decision diagrams. Preliminary results indicate that a substantial advantage may be gained by employing suitable simulation paths—motivating a thorough consideration.

Executing quantum circuits on currently available quantum computers requires compiling them to a representation that conforms to all restrictions imposed by the targeted architecture. Due to the limited connectivity of the devices’ physical qubits, an important step in the compilation process is to map the circuit in such a way that all its gates are executable on the hardware. Existing solutions delivering optimal solutions to this task are severely challenged by the exponential complexity of the problem. In this paper, we show that the search space of the mapping problem can be limited drastically while still preserving optimality. The proposed strategies are generic, architecture-independent, and can be adapted to various mapping methodologies. The findings are backed by both, theoretical considerations and experimental evaluations. Results confirm that, by limiting the search space, optimal solutions can be determined for instances that timeouted before or speed-ups of up to three orders of magnitude can …

Classical simulations of quantum computations are vital for the future development of this emerging technology. To this end, decision diagrams have been proposed as a complementary technique which frequently allows to tackle the inherent exponential complexity of these simulations. In the worst case, however, they still cannot escape this complexity. Additionally, while other techniques make use of all the available processing power, decision diagram-based simulation to date cannot exploit the many processing units of today’s systems. In this work, we show that both problems can be tackled together by employing a hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman scheme for the simulation. More precisely, we show that realizing such a scheme with decision diagrams is indeed possible, we discuss the resulting problems in its realization, and propose solutions how they can be handled. Experimental evaluations confirm that this significantly advances the state of the art in decision diagram-based simulation—allowing to simulate …

Due to the significant progress made in the implementation of quantum hardware, efficient methods and tools to design corresponding algorithms become increasingly important. Many of these tools rely on functional representations of certain building blocks or even entire quantum algorithms which, however, inherently exhibit an exponential complexity. Although several alternative representations have been proposed to cope with this complexity, the construction of those representations remains a bottleneck. In this work, we propose solutions for efficiently constructing representations of quantum functionality based on the idea of conducting as many operations as possible on as small as possible intermediate representations – using Decision Diagrams as a representative functional description. Experimental evaluations show that applying these solutions allows to construct the desired representations several factors faster than with state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, if repeating structures (which …

With the emergence of more and more applications for quantum computing, also the development of corresponding methods for design automation is receiving increasing interest. In this respect, decision diagrams provide a promising basis for many design tasks such as simulation, synthesis, verification, and more. However, users of the corresponding tools often do not have a proper background or an intuition about how these methods based on decision diagrams work and what their strengths and limits are. In an effort to make decision diagrams for quantum computing more accessible, we present a visualization tool which visualizes quantum decision diagrams and allows to explore their behavior when used in the design tasks mentioned above. The installation-free web-tool allows users to interactively learn how decision diagrams can be used in quantum computing, e.g., to (1) compactly represent quantum states and the functionality of quantum circuits, (2) to efficiently simulate quantum circuits, and (3) to verify the …